WHAT YOU GET WITH VIBEREVIEW
Secure AI-written code. Every prompt. Every PR.
VibeReview threat-analyzes every prompt and serves the matching guardrails to your AI coding tools. The secure version gets written the first time. Your PR review stays short. Your dashboard stays clean — you stay in flow.
14-day free trial · No card required
WATCH IT IN ACTION
From prompt to secure ship in 90 seconds.
A real prompt in Cursor. Watch VibeReview threat-analyze, pull the guardrails, and let your agent ship the secure version on the first try.
Demo video coming soon
A 90-second walkthrough: prompt → guardrails matched → secure code shipped.
WORKS INSIDE THE TOOLS YOU ALREADY USE
OUTCOME 1
Your repo's threats, mapped in minutes
Point us at the repo. We map the entry points, trust boundaries, and data flows your AI agent is most likely to misuse. You don't write a threat-model doc. You don't run an audit. We do it from your code.
OUTCOME 2
Rules tied to your repo, not a generic checklist
We generate guardrails that match the threats your stack actually has. Each rule has a name, a one-line rationale, and a category. Edit, version, or turn one off in a click — they're yours, not a vendor's catalog.
OUTCOME 3
Secure code, the first time you prompt
Your AI coding tools — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot — pull your guardrails on every prompt, invisibly. The model has the right context to write the secure version first. No copy-paste, no second pass, no security tab open in another window.
OUTCOME 4
PR reviews that say what to fix, not what to read
Open a pull request. We comment only on the lines that crossed a guardrail — with the rule name and a one-line mitigation. No 40-comment review storms. Your humans get to review architecture and intent.
⚠ A03 · High — User input flows directly into the SQL string on line 42.
Suggestion: use parameterized queries (rule "Parameterize all SQL queries").
OUTCOME 5
One dashboard, every repo, every threat
See your security posture across every project. The threats that keep recurring, the rules that keep firing, OWASP coverage at a glance. One place to track posture without poking ten tools.
OUTCOME 6
Lives in your terminal too
Most of the time the rules ride your IDE invisibly. When you live on the terminal, vibereview-kit gives you the same checks at the command line and as a pre-commit hook. Same rules, same dashboard.
$ vibereview scan ./api
✓ 0 critical · 1 high · 3 medium
✓ pre-commit hook installedPROACTIVE, NOT POST-HOC
Common questions on how VibeReview lives upstream of the bug.
Are non-developers really shipping production code with AI now? Should I care?
Yes — and that's the point. A February 2026 analysis of the r/vibecoding community (153K members) found 63% of active vibe coders aren't developers: PMs, designers, founders, marketers, ops. Brian Armstrong said about 40% of Coinbase's daily code is AI-generated and that non-technical teams are shipping production code. The threat surface used to be "your engineers' commits." Now it's "anyone with a Cursor seat." Reactive tools (SAST queues, PR scanners) react after the fact — by then the AI-generated insecure code is already merged. VibeReview makes every prompt threat-informed before the code is even written, regardless of who's prompting.
How does VibeReview decide which guardrails apply to my repo?
We threat-model your repo first. We read it for entry points, trust boundaries, where user input lands, where secrets live, and the moves an AI coding agent is most likely to mis-handle. The code profile — languages, frameworks, drivers, CI — is built against that threat model: stack facts in service of the threats they introduce. Guardrails are then generated as direct responses to each threat, mapped onto the OWASP Top 10 and Cisco AI Security Taxonomy. Nothing in the rule set is generic. Every rule traces back to a real threat your repo has.
How is VibeReview different from SAST tools like Snyk Code, Semgrep, or SonarQube?
SAST is reactive: scan after the fact, return a triage queue of findings. VibeReview is proactive: we threat-model the repo first, generate guardrails for those specific threats, then feed the rules to the IDE while the code is being written. The threats often never make it into the PR. When a PR does land, we comment only on the diff lines that crossed a rule — not the whole file. Run SAST for periodic audits; run VibeReview for the prompt-to-PR loop.
Doesn't my IDE already do security? Why not just Copilot's built-in checks?
Copilot, Cursor, and Codex catch what their model already knows — common bugs, popular patterns. They don't know your repo's threat model: which inputs are trusted, where the security boundary is, what data each endpoint touches. VibeReview builds the threat model first, generates rules from it, then serves them to the IDE via MCP on every prompt. Same IDE, no extra agent, rules tied to your specific threats — not a generic catalog.
Isn't this just another SCA or dependency scanner?
Different layer. SCA flags known CVEs in your package manifest. VibeReview flags hazards in the code your team — or your AI — just wrote, against a threat model of your repo: SQL string interpolation on a user-input path, secret logging, missing webhook signature checks, tool-output trust in MCP clients. Run both.
How is this different from running OWASP Top 10 checklists?
OWASP is a catalog of categories. A threat model is the list of categories that actually apply to your repo and how they show up in your stack. VibeReview builds the threat model first — entry points, trust boundaries, AI failure modes — then maps it onto OWASP and the Cisco AI Security Taxonomy. The result is a set of rules that name a real threat in your code, not a generic checkbox. Each rule is editable, versioned, and toggleable.
Why MCP and not just another VS Code extension?
MCP is the only way to put a threat-informed rule in front of the model on every prompt. Extensions react after the suggestion lands; MCP shapes it before. Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex speak MCP natively. We still ship a VS Code extension for Copilot — since Copilot doesn't speak MCP yet — but everywhere else the threat-tied rules ride the protocol the IDE already supports.
Will VibeReview replace my human PR reviewers?
No. VibeReview catches security regressions at write-time, inside the IDE, against a threat model of your repo — so they rarely reach the PR. When something does land, we comment only on the diff lines that crossed a guardrail, with the rule name and a one-line mitigation. Your humans focus on architecture, naming, and intent. Diff-aware, not 40-comment storms.
Stop reviewing AI code by hand.
Set up VibeReview in your IDE in five minutes. 14-day free trial.