DAY ONE
AppSec without an AppSec hire.
VibeReview runs the threat model, generates the guardrails, and produces the procurement evidence your first enterprise buyer asks for. You ship features, not security debt.
FOR AI-NATIVE STARTUPS
Founders shipping prompt-to-prod don't have an AppSec team yet. VibeReview is the AppSec team. It runs the threat model, writes the guardrails, and produces the SOC 2 and ISO evidence procurement asks for on day one.
14-day free trial · No card required
"Add an endpoint to fetch user orders by ID."
@app.get("/orders/{order_id}")
def get_order(
order_id: int,
user = Depends(auth),
):
return db.execute(
"SELECT * FROM orders "
"WHERE id = ? AND user_id = ?",
(order_id, user.id),
) ✓ Built secure on the first prompt — no review needed.
DAY ONE
VibeReview runs the threat model, generates the guardrails, and produces the procurement evidence your first enterprise buyer asks for. You ship features, not security debt.
SCALE
Every new repo connects in minutes. Every new prompt picks up the matching rules. No backlog of unscanned services or untriaged findings.
EXIT-READY
Mapping reports for SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, OWASP ASVS, MASVS, and the CISA Secure-by-Design pledge. When the buyer's security team asks, you send a report.
FOUNDER QUESTIONS
No. We read it to build a profile, then we keep only the profile metadata (languages, frameworks, etc.) — not your source.
Yes, on Team and above. Add them in the dashboard or via the vibereview-kit CLI; they'll show up in your IDE on the next sync.
Cancel any time. Your tenant stops at the end of the billing period — your guardrails and projects stay safe-archived for 90 days, so you can restart later without losing your setup.
Yes — and that's the point. A February 2026 analysis of the r/vibecoding community (153K members) found 63% of active vibe coders aren't developers: PMs, designers, founders, marketers, ops. Brian Armstrong said about 40% of Coinbase's daily code is AI-generated and that non-technical teams are shipping production code. The threat surface used to be "your engineers' commits." Now it's "anyone with a Cursor seat." Reactive tools (SAST queues, PR scanners) react after the fact — by then the AI-generated insecure code is already merged. VibeReview makes every prompt threat-informed before the code is even written, regardless of who's prompting.
SAST is reactive: scan after the fact, return a triage queue of findings. VibeReview is proactive: we threat-model the repo first, generate guardrails for those specific threats, then feed the rules to the IDE while the code is being written. The threats often never make it into the PR. When a PR does land, we comment only on the diff lines that crossed a rule — not the whole file. Run SAST for periodic audits; run VibeReview for the prompt-to-PR loop.
Connect a repo. Threat model runs. Guardrails generate. Your next prompt picks them up.